Rolling Stone Mobile - Politics - Politics: Hank Greenberg Should Be Shot into Space For Suing the Government over the AIG Bailout
Politics
Politics: Hank Greenberg Should Be Shot into Space For Suing the Government over the AIG Bailout
By
January 9, 2013
If there is such a person as an innocent AIG shareholder who was harmed by the government's conduct, it sure as hell isn't Hank Greenberg.

In fact, since the collapse of AIG was perhaps the most important event in causing the financial crisis of 2008 to spiral out of control, you can put Hank Greenberg on the very short list of individuals who are most responsible for the economic catastrophe. A few weeks ago I put former Countrywide chief Angelo Mozilo, former Lehman head Dick Fuld and Greenberg's former subordinate Joe Cassano (the former head of AIG's Financial Products unit) on that list, but Greenberg should be right there riding the bus of shame with all of those excellent folks.

It's this fact, not the merits of the actual lawsuit, that make this news story so outrageous.

Like all narcissists, Greenberg is physically incapable of admitting any mistake he's ever made, and he's made plenty of them. Among other things, Greenberg in 2000 helped AIG artificially bolster its reserves by green-lighting a phony reinsurance transaction with a company called General Re (a subsidiary of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway) that puffed up AIG's loss reserves by about $500 million.

Even though a federal judge ruled that Greenberg was a conspirator in that case, and even though that scandal led to AIG in 2006 paying what at the time was the biggest settlement ever ($1.6 billion, paid to Eliot Spitzer's New York state regulators and George W. Bush's Justice Department and SEC), Greenberg has always denied responsibility, and his bumlicking minions in the financial press like Maria Bartiromo are still protesting his innocence long after everybody on Wall Street forgot about the case (that was nineteen billion-dollar scandals ago!).

Post Comment
You're a fuking moron!!! I thought research was the cardinal canon of journalism? Oh, wait, you write for RS. Greenberg wasn't at the helm of AIG when they took on the credit default swaps. If he had been, it never would have happened. In '07 when the firm had $80b worth of that garbage, Hank had already been two years removed as CEO by the OUTSIDE board and the underage ***** fornicator DB Elliot Spitzer. The charges Spitzer pontificated through the MEDIA, not in COURT, were groundless fabrications. Saber rattling with the intent to intimidate. After all that BS Hank was never charged with a crime in COURT bc one had not been committed. Total poppycock!. Hank is suing because the gov't assistance AIG received was vastly different and draconian when compared to other financial institutions who got bailed out. Only AIG received the funds under high interest pay back and the gov't took ownership of only AIG. Why did AIG receive such a vastly different structure? This thrashed the stock value and as Hank is AIG primary shareholder affecting his net-worth. This is the basis of the lawsuit. Hank was not on the Board and was not in a position to contest these terms when they were offered. Had he been, he clearly would not have accepted. The firm floundered while Hank was outsted, not under his watch. Under Hanks 40 years as CEO he grew AIG into an American icon, the WORLDS 18 largest publicly traded company to the likes we'll likely never see again. It's a travesty what happened to AIG. It's a fuking shame. Hank did not commit a crime. He was outsted by an over zealous DA with aspiration of governor and an opportunistic board on a power grab. The troubles that sank AIG would NEVER have happened under Greenbergs watch. Do your research, ****
Posted by Capable March 21, 2013, 1:02 am
My dog is smarter than this moron
Posted by Chris111 January 9, 2013, 5:32 pm